“But on the next
day, desiring to know the real reason why he was being accused by the Jews, he
unbound him and commanded the chief priests and all the council to meet, and he
brought Paul down and set him before them.
And looking intently at the council, Paul said, Brothers, I have lived
my life before God in all good conscience up to this day. And the high priest Ananias commanded those
who stood by him to strike him on the mouth…The following night the Lord stood
by him and said, ‘Take courage, for as you have testified to the facts about me
in Jerusalem, so you must testify also in Rome.’” –Ac 22:30-23:2; 23:11 (ESV. Read Acts 22:30 – Acts 23:11).
Claudius Lysias could not have Paul
flogged to find out (he thought) the truth about why Paul was arrested because
Paul had claimed protection under his Roman citizenship. The Roman tribune
called a meeting of the Jewish Sanhedrin, the council made up of both Pharisees
and Sadducees. These two groups,
although they both believed and practiced Jewish law, were opposed in
beliefs. The Pharisees believed in
resurrection from the dead and the Sadducees did not. As Paul began to give testimony before the
group, stating that he had lived before them in good conscience, Ananias, the
high priest, commanded those nearest Paul to strike him on the lips. Paul, knowing the law himself, and that the
high priest should be astute in administering the law, even as it related to
prisoners, Paul called Ananias a “whitewashed
wall.” This term denoted
hypocrisy. Jesus himself had used it in
Matthew 23:27 in speaking of the scribes and Pharisees being ‘like whitewashed tombs which are outwardly
beautiful, but within are full of dead people’s bones and all uncleanness.” Paul
would also have known Leviticus 19:15 which states: “You
shall do no injustice in court. You
shall not be partial to the poor or defer to the great, but in righteousness
shall you judge your neighbor.” Then
someone asked Paul if he would “revile
God’s high priest?” Paul pleads
innocence in not knowing that Ananias was the high priest and apologizes. He
knew the law on how to treat officers of the law, quoting, “You shall not speak evil of a ruler of your people” (Exodus
22:28).
After all, Paul had been away
from Jerusalem for several years, and when there he did not associate with the
Council as he had prior to becoming a Christian. Some commentators relate Paul’s not knowing
that it was the high priest who ordered him to be stuck might have been because
of his poor eyesight or how far away from Ananias Paul stood during this public
hearing. But Ananias’ action,
nonetheless, shows his disregard for the prisoner and his inability to control
his own anger, even in public.
Next came Paul’s testimony before the
Sanhedrin. He claimed his connection to
the Pharisees and his firm belief in the resurrection rom the dead. And then he said, because of that very
belief, he now was on trial before them.
With such a contentious subject as the resurrection spoken in public,
the two sects began their own harangue, arguing about the resurrection and
whether a spirit or angel might have spoken to Paul (another belief held by the
Pharisees and not the Sadducees). The
Pharisees declared him innocent. With such clamor, the tribune feared Paul
might be harmed andordered the soldiers to take Paul by force to the
barracks. It was at night that Paul had
a visitation from the Lord Himself assuring the missionary that now since he
had testified in Jerusalem, he would go to Rome to testify. Again, I use the theme sentence from the past
two days: God’s ways are higher than man’s ways, in all ways, and always. God has a plan, and if we are willing to
follow, as Paul was, God will work out the details. God be praised!
No comments:
Post a Comment